Saturday, March 10, 2018

Roilo: I am not in full agreement with PRRD's foreign and domestic policies (most particularly PRRD's policy on the West Philippine Sea, China and the South China Sea), but I believe the UN Human Rights High Commissioner by his statement against PRRD violated the following provisions and content of the UN Declaration on Human Rights, his office's mandate,

Roilo: I am not in full agreement with PRRD's foreign and domestic policies (most particularly PRRD's policy on the West Philippine Sea, China and the South China Sea), but I believe the UN Human Rights High Commissioner by his statement against PRRD violated the following provisions and content of the UN Declaration on Human Rights, his office's mandate, as follows:
"Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person..." 
"Article 1.
All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood."
"Article 12.
No one shall be subjected... to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks."
I believe the UN Human Rights Commissioner, among all the humans beings in this Planet, is subject to the highest standards of the UN Declaration on Human Rights and must not violate said Declaration in any way regardless of provocation.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) is a milestone document in the history of human rights. Drafted by representatives with different legal and cultural backgrounds from all regions of the world, the Declaration was proclaimed by the United Nations General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948 (General Assembly resolution 217 A) as a common standard of achievements for all peoples and all nations. It sets out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected and it has been translated into over 500 languages.
Download PDF
Preamble
Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,
Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people,
Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law,
Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations,
Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,
Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in co-operation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms,
Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge,
Now, Therefore THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY proclaims THIS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction. 
Article 1.
All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
Article 2.
Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.
Article 3.
Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.
Article 4.
No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.
Article 5.
No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
Article 6.
Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.
Article 7.
All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.
Article 8.
Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.
Article 9.
No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.
Article 10.
Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.
Article 11.
(1) Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.
(2) No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal offence was committed.
Article 12.
No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.
Article 13.
(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.
(2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.
Article 14.
(1) Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution.
(2) This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely arising from non-political crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.
Article 15.
(1) Everyone has the right to a nationality.
(2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.
Article 16.
(1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.
(2) Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.
(3) The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.
Article 17.
(1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others.
(2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.
Article 18.
Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.
Article 19.
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
Article 20.
(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.
(2) No one may be compelled to belong to an association.
Article 21.
(1) Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.
(2) Everyone has the right of equal access to public service in his country.
(3) The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.
Article 22.
Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.
Article 23.
(1) Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.
(2) Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work.
(3) Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection.
(4) Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.
Article 24.
Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.
Article 25.
(1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.
(2) Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.
Article 26.
(1) Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit.
(2) Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace.
(3) Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.
Article 27.
(1) Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits.
(2) Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is the author.
Article 28.
Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.
Article 29.
(1) Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.
(2) In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.
(3) These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.
Article 30.
Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.



image: http://media.philstar.com/images/articles/gen1-zeid-raad-al-hussein-un_2018-03-10_22-12-20.jpg
“This action of High Commissioner Zeid Ra’ad Al-Hussein is completely uncalled for and demeans not only the head of state of a member-state, but tarnishes the reputation of the Office of the High Commissioner,” Foreign Affairs Secretary Alan Peter Cayetano added. Fabrice Coffrini/AFP/File
Department of Foreign Affairs hits United Nations officials: No need for insults 
84SHARES710
Janvic MateoChristina Mendez (The Philippine Star) - March 11, 2018 - 12:01am 
MANILA, Philippines — It was “irresponsible and disrespectful” of the United Nations human rights chief to say that President Duterte needs a psychiatric evaluation, Foreign Affairs Secretary Alan Peter Cayetano said on Friday.
In a statement, Cayetano also defended Duterte, saying the world needs more leaders like him who has empathy for the people and is ready to sacrifice his life to protect them.
“The Philippines takes grave exception to the irresponsible and disrespectful comments of the United Nations (UN) High Commissioner for Human Rights that cast untoward aspersions regarding the President of the Republic of the Philippines,” Cayetano said.
image: https://video.unrulymedia.com/native/images/in-art-close-icon-128x128-16481b937f87b244a645cdbef0d930f8.png
–– ADVERTISEMENT ––
image: https://video.unrulymedia.com/native/opt-out-icon2.png
image: https://video.unrulymedia.com/native/images/unmiss-sound-button-muted-e74d67a0c85c3548f07d7564782a269c.svg

“This action of High Commissioner Zeid Ra’ad Al-Hussein is completely uncalled for and demeans not only the head of state of a member-state, but tarnishes the reputation of the Office of the High Commissioner,” he added.

Cayetano made the statement even as Duterte himself kept hurling insults at his critics, including UN special rapporteur for extrajudicial killings Agnes Callamard and International Criminal Court prosecutor Fatou Bensouda, whom he called “the undernourished one” and “that black woman,” respectively.
The DFA did not respond when asked if Cayetano communicated with UN officials regarding the recent insults made by Duterte.
In his statement, the DFA chief said the comments of Zeid have brought great dishonor to the Human Rights Council, as there is supposedly no reason for such “unmeasured outburst” directed at Duterte.
Zeid on Friday said Duterte may need “to submit himself to some sort of psychiatric evaluation” after his government included UN special rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples Victoria Tauli-Corpuz – a Filipino national – in the list of alleged communists that it wants declared as terrorists.
He also criticized Duterte over his use of profanity against Callamard, a critic of his administration’s war against illegal drugs.
“This is absolutely disgraceful that the president of a country could speak in this way, using the foulest of language against a rapporteur that is highly respected,” Zeid was quoted as saying. Cayetano accused Zeid of overstepping his mandate when he made the comments.

“The Philippines is perturbed over the manner in which a ranking UN human rights official can overstep his mandate and insult leaders of member-states without first giving them due process,” he said.
“This could set a dangerous precedent that the council would have to immediately address as otherwise member-states could also fall victim to those who seek to politicize and weaponize human rights to undermine legitimate governments,” the DFA chief added.

Destabilization

Cayetano also warned Zeid against letting groups use him for their efforts to destabilize the Duterte administration.
“The High Commissioner may not be aware of it, but he is being used in a well-orchestrated effort to destabilize a legitimate government that is being undertaken by parties with self-serving agendas and who stand to benefit the most by unseating President Duterte,” he said.
Cayetano did not provide details regarding the supposed destabilization, a claim often used by Duterte’s allies to counter criticisms against some of the policies of the administration.
The secretary earlier called on the UN Human Rights Council not to allow the issue of human rights to be politicized or weaponized.
He maintained that the view of the international community would change if they witness firsthand the situation in the Philippines rather than listening to the reports of critics of Duterte.
His administration has been claiming it’s open to an investigation – but not by one led by Callamard.
Moreover, he had directed security forces not to answer questions from any rapporteur investigating his administration’s human rights record.
In Iloilo, presidential spokesman Harry Roque also lambasted Zeid, saying the latter’s remarks about Duterte was uncalled for and an affront to Philippine sovereignty.
He even called Zeid’s attention to the fact that unlike the Philippines where leaders are elected, Jordan’s leaders are determined by succession. Zeid is a Jordanian prince.
“I will reiterate, however, that such language directed against a democratically-elected head of a UN member-country is uncalled for and is, of course, an affront on the sovereignty of the Republic of the Philippines,” he said.
“Your language is not just an insult to the Philippines and the Filipino people. It is an insult to all countries who have democratically elected their heads of states,” Roque said, addressing Zeid.
“Now, this classification of rapporteur Corpuz has also resorted into very harsh language coming from the Prince of Jordan, who is also the high commissioner on human rights,” Roque said in a briefing in Iloilo.
“I reiterate that the language used by the high commissioner is uncalled for. I am very tempted to respond in similar language but I have opted to restrain myself, opting not to respond in the same admonishment used by the UN High Commissioner,” the presidential spokesman added.
Roque said he wanted to believe that Zeid may have misread President Duterte’s actuations.
“I will, however, state that perhaps the UN High Commissioner’s language is because of the fact that they do not have democracy in the state of Jordan. Jordan’s leader is not elected unlike our President and so my message to the High Commissioner is: We respect our President in this country because we gave him a democratic mandate to lead,” Roque maintained.
“And I would hope that although you do not have the same democratic system in your home country of Jordan, you will respect the kind of democracy that we have in the Philippines,” he added.

Read more at https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2018/03/11/1795588/department-foreign-affairs-hits-united-nations-officials-no-need-insults#TTk5S2mCv9HLOu7v.99

No comments:

Post a Comment