Solar power has gotten so good we can use it to power airplanes

An airplane has flown across the United States, powered only by sunlight. The impressive feat was made possible by improvements in solar cell and battery technology. This chart, produced by the Department of Energy, shows how solar technology has improved:
(Lawrence Kazmerski, National Renewable Energy Laboratory)
(Lawrence Kazmerski, National Renewable Energy Laboratory)
The efficiency is the fraction of captured solar energy that is converted into electrical power. The Web site for the plane, named Solar Impulse, reports that the vessel was powered by monocrystalline silicon solar cells, represented by blue squares on the chart. Interestingly, this is not the most energy-efficient category of solar cells. However, Solar Impulse’s designers were less concerned with absolute efficiency than they were with the ratio of efficiency to weight. The lighter the solar cells, the farther the plane could fly on each kWH of energy.
Because the flight across the United States took more than 24 hours (specifically, about 2 months), the plane needed to collect energy during the day and then use it at night. It used lightweight lithium polymer batteries to do this. The Solar Impulse team says the “total efficiency of the propulsion train”—counting power lost by the solar cells, the batteries and other components—was about 12 percent.
Solar-powered airplanes won’t replace traditional airplanes any time soon. Airplanes powered by traditional jet fuel fly much faster and can carry much heavier loads. But the flight across the United States was an impressive feat of engineering. And the Solar Impulse team now has its sights on an even bigger goal: flying around the world on solar power.
12Comments
Sort:  
Anthony J. Alfidi
The combined SEMICON West and Intersolar North America 2013 in San Francisco were once again the touchstone for acquiring knowledge of silicon and solar. It's too bad they didn't have solar-powered planes on hand. http://alfidicapitalblog.blogspot.com/2013/07/alfi...
DavidS_Colorado
"Solar-powered airplanes won’t replace traditional airplanes any time soon." Yeah - you got that right. The Solar impulse uses 2,200 sqft of wing and can carry 1 person. At that ratio, (a very simplistic example here) a solar powered airplane designed to carry 20 people would need a wing the size of a football field.
wolfemi1
5:30 AM GMT+0800
I'm pretty sure that wing surface area and cargo capacity don't scale 1:1. 
bannedagain5446
"Because the flight across the United States took more than 24 hours, the plane needed to collect energy during the day and then use it at night."

This is wrong. The trip took two months.

http://www.nbcnews.com/technology/solar-impulse-plane-ends-american-odyssey-fears-tears-cheers-6C10551691
Yo...Yo...Yotorious
3:40 AM GMT+0800
maybe the 24hr was actual flying time?
bannedagain5446
3:48 AM GMT+0800
perhaps but it seems a disingenuous way to characterize it, if unintentional.

The fact of the matter is, they're nowhere close to being able to fly any solar plane across the US, although they can keep it aloft for a relatively long period of time if they glide. They can fly from city to city and that's about it.
liberalismiscommonsense
4:21 AM GMT+0800
It's probably purely to distinguish between the relatively short flights of commercial planes and the current experimental plane, and to alert us to the fact that sun doesn't shine continuously, even above the clouds.
I give everybody the benefit of the doubt.
bannedagain5446
4:53 AM GMT+0800
I salute their ingenuity and technical expertise but no the plane can't fly across the country except the same way an ultra light can, by staying at a lot of Holiday Inns.
Timothy B. Lee
4:54 AM GMT+0800
Two months is more than 24 hours, so my statement was accurate. But I will update it to make it more clear.
bannedagain5446
5:02 AM GMT+0800
Tim I like that you have a sense of humor.

You have been a good addition to this joint.
ProfG
5:05 AM GMT+0800
You can write "specifically" and "about" in the same sentence in the WaPo now? Oh for an editor!
Good for them. Seems like they've got a ways to go, but this is certainly something to build off of.