| 2013-8-12 21:48:01 By Global Times |
|
Illustration: Liu Rui/GT
It is reported that Russia will deliver the first of the six naval diesel-powered submarines of "Project 636M Varshavyanka" class to Vietnam in November. According to a military deal between Russia and Vietnam signed in 2009, all the six Kilo-class variants are scheduled for handover to the Vietnamese navy by 2016.Russia's move has aroused heated controversy, especially at this critical moment when Vietnam is engaged in fierce disputes with China over islands in the South China Sea.
Some analysts think the decision actually demonstrates Russia's intention to respond to a rising China through increased military cooperation with Vietnam, one of the claimants to the oil and gas-rich Nansha and Xisha islands in the South China Sea.
Nevertheless, it goes a little too far to say that Russia aims at threatening China by providing submarines and crews as well as training Vietnamese military specialists.
Russia has a tradition of military cooperation with Vietnam. The Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation between the USSR and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, characterized by military coordination, was signed in 1978 in Moscow. What's more, every sovereign state has the right to choose which countries to cooperate with. Neither Russia nor Vietnam should be blamed for signing such a military deal.
Objectively, Vietnam's increasing military strength will definitely exert a negative influence upon the peaceful settlement of the South China Sea disputes, but it is not fair to say that the Kremlin targets Beijing.
Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu held quiet talks with his Vietnamese counterpart Phung Quang Thanh in Hanoi this April. The two sides discussed the possibility of Russian specialists using the military base in Cam Ranh Bay, which was once used by the Soviet and then the Russian navies but abandoned in 2002 due to lack of funds.
While visiting Moscow last week, the Vietnamese defense minister welcomed Russia to use Cam Ranh military base.
A return to Cam Ranh Bay will help strengthen Russia's position in Southeast Asia. The former superpower that once balanced US hegemony is now facing new challenges as Washington quickens steps in its "pivot to Asia" strategy.
The Kremlin may feel responsible for security and stability in this region, and therefore makes military readjustment by expanding investment in military buildup and equipment.
Moreover, Russia's assistance for Vietnam today should be viewed differently from that during the Cold War, when the Soviet Union regarded the US as its major rival and had a contentious relationship with China.
Currently, Moscow is trying to establish a good relationship with China as both are obliged to maintain the security of the Asia-Pacific region. The growing US military presence in the strategically important region is of particular concern for Russia.
Besides a possible return to Cam Ranh Bay, Moscow also holds joint military drills with Beijing, another sign of Russia increasingly participating in Asian affairs.
Nonetheless, such participation will be unlikely to trigger fundamental changes in the architecture of Southeast Asia, which is decided by the reciprocal constraints of several powers including the US and China. Nor will its decision bring challenge to China's security.
China should view Russia's role positively and address the international row over the South China Sea through consultations from a long-term perspective.
Beijing is supposed to forge a new effective mechanism of security cooperation in concerted efforts with Russia and other countries in Southeast Asia if possible. And such a mechanism should be controllable and predictable, which would be conducive to peace and stability in this region.
China had better keep a larger picture in mind, looking to strategic needs and diplomatic solutions. A comprehensive approach may let the South China Sea disputes work themselves out.
The article was compiled by Global Times reporter Wang Xiaonan based on an interview with Wang Lijiu, a research fellow with the Institute of Russian Studies at China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations. wangxiaonan@globaltimes.com.cn
What's a Kilo-class submarine?
Kilo-class submarine
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
An Iranian Kilo class submarine, the Yunes | |
Class overview | |
---|---|
Builders: | Central Design Bureau for Marine Engineering “Rubin”
Shipyard 199 "Krasnoe Sormovo", Nizhniy Novgorod (Gorkiy)
Shipyard 112,"imeni Leninskogo Komsomola", Komsoloľsk na Amure
Shipyard "Leningradskoe Admiralteyskoe Obedinenie" (Admiralteyskie Verfi), Saint Petersburg (Leningrad)
Shipyard "Severnoe Mašinostroiteľnoe Predprijatie", Severodvinsk |
Operators: | Soviet Navy Russian Navy People's Liberation Army Navy Indian Navy Islamic Republic of Iran Navy Polish Navy Romanian Naval Forces Algerian National Navy Vietnamese People's Navy |
Preceded by: | Tango class submarine |
Succeeded by: | Lada class submarine |
In commission: | April 1982 |
Building: | 7 |
Completed: | 57 |
Active: | 48 |
Retired: | 2 |
General characteristics | |
Displacement: | Surfaced: 2,300–2,350 tons Submerged:3,000-3,950 tons full load |
Length: | 70.0–74.0 m |
Beam: | 9.9 m |
Draft: | 6.5 m |
Depth of hold: | Operational: 240 meters Maximum: 300 meters |
Installed power: | Diesel-electric |
Propulsion: | Diesel-electric propulsion 2 x 1000 kW Diesel generators 1 x 5,500–6,800 shp Propulsion motor 1 x fixed-pitch 6 or 7 bladed Propeller(6BL project 877) (7BL project 636) |
Speed: | Surfaced: 10–12 knots Submerged: 17–25 knots |
Range: | With snorkel: 6,000–7,500 miles at 7 knots Submerged: 400 miles at 3 knots Full run: 12.7 miles at 21 knots |
Endurance: | 45 days |
Test depth: | 300 m |
Complement: | 52 |
Armament: | 6/533 mm torpedo tubes 18 torpedoes Club S anti-ship missiles (only on some export versions) 24 mines 8 SA-N-8 Gremlin or 8 SA-N-10 GimletSurface-to-air missiles (export submarines may not be equipped with air defense weapons) |
The Kilo class is the NATO reporting name for a naval diesel-electric submarine that is made in Russia. The original version of the vessels were designated Project 877 Paltus (Halibut) in Russia. There is also a more advanced version, designated asImproved Kilo in the west, and Project 636 Varshavyanka in Russia.
The Kilo class was to have been succeeded by the Lada class. In November 2011 the Russian Navy announced that the Lada class will not enter service because trials with the lead boat of the new class, Sankt Peterburg (B-585) had shown major deficiencies. Construction of two further boats has been suspended.[1]
The boats are mainly intended for anti-shipping and anti-submarineoperations in relatively shallow waters. Original Project 877 boats are equipped with Rubikon MGK-400 sonar system (with NATO reporting name Shark Gill), which includes a mine detection and avoidance sonar MG-519 Arfa (with NATO reporting name Mouse Roar). Newer Project 636 boats are equipped with improved MGK-400EM, with MG-519 Afra also upgraded to MG-519EM. The improved sonar systems have reduced the number of operators needed by sharing the same console via automation.
Anechoic tiles are fitted on casings and fins to absorb the sonar sound waves of active sonar, which results in a reduction and distortion of the return signal.[2] These tiles also help attenuate sounds that are emitted from the submarine, thus reducing the range by which the sub may be detected by passive sonar.[3]
Contents
[hide]Operators
The first submarine entered service in the Soviet Navy in 1980, and the class remains in use with the Russian Navy today. 17 vessels are believed to still be in active service with the Russian Navy, while 7 vessels are thought to be in reserve.[6] So far, 33 vessels have been exported to several countries:
- Algeria : 2 Original Kilo, 2 Improved Kilo.[7]
- People's Republic of China : 2 Original Kilo, 10 ImprovedKilo.[8][9][10]
- India : Designated as the Sindhughosh class; 10 active.[11][12]
- Poland : 1 Kilo ORP Orzeł.[13]
- Iran : 3 Kilo.[14]
- Romania : 1 Kilo – (Delfinul II).[15]
- Russia : 17 Kilo in active service (B-445; B-459 Vladikavkaz; B-464 Ust'-Kamchatsk; B-471 Magnitogorsk; B-494 Ust'-Bolsheretsk; B-800 Kaluga; B-871 Alrosa; B-808 Yaroslavl'; B-177 Lipetsk; B-806; B-340; B-190; B-227; B-260 Chita; B-345; B-394; B-402 Vologda).;[16] 6 Improved Kilo ordered[17]
- Vietnam : 6 Improved Kilo (Kilo-636 KMV) on order, contract signed in 2010, production of one per year.[18]
Possible operators
- The government of Venezuela expressed interest in buying 3 Project 636 Kilo class submarines[19]
- The government of Indonesia in 2007-2008 planned to acquire at least 2 Kilo class submarines. Until now there is no any new report about this plan. Possibly postponed or cancelled.
Project 877 units
Operator | # | Name | Shipyard | Project | Laid down | Launched | Commissioned | Fleet | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Russia | B-248 | x | Komsomoľsk na Amure | 877 | 16 March 1980 | 12.09.1980 | 31 December 1980 | in reserve | |
Russia | B-260 | Chita | Komsomoľsk na Amure | 877 | 22 February 1981 | 23 August 1981 | 30 December 1981 | PF | active as of 2010 |
Russia | B-227 | Vyborg | Komsomoľsk na Amure | 877 | 23 February 1982 | 16 September 1982 | 23 February 1983 | BF | active as of 2010 |
Russia | B-229 | x | Komsomoľsk na Amure | 877 | 23 February 1983 | 15 July 1983 | 30 October 1983 | in reserve | |
Russia | B-404 | x | Komsomoľsk na Amure | 877 | 07.05.1983 | 24 September 1983 | 30 December 1983 | in reserve | |
Russia | B-401 | Novosibirsk | Nizhniy Novgorod | 877 | 06.10.1982 | 15 March 1984 | 30 September 1984 | NF | active as of 2010 |
Russia | B-402 | Vologda | Nizhniy Novgorod | 877 | 24 August 1983 | 29 September 1984 | 30 December 1984 | NF | active as of 2010 |
Russia | B-405 | (ex Tyumenskiy Komsomolets) | Komsomoľsk na Amure | 877 | 20 April 1984 | 21 September 1984 | 30 December 1984 | decommissioned and sold for scrap in 2007 | |
Poland | 291 (ex B-351) | Orzeł | Nizhniy Novgorod | 877E | 1984 | 1985 | 1985 | active as of 2010 | |
Romania | 581 (ex B-801) | Delfinul II | Nizhniy Novgorod | 877E | 1984 | 1985 | 1985 | unknown (in reserve from 1995) | |
India | S55 | Sindhugosh | Saint Petersburg | 877EKM | 29 May 1983 | 29 July 1985 | 25 November 1985 | active as of 2010, modernized to project 08773 in 2002–2005 | |
Russia | B-470 | x | Komsomoľsk na Amure | 877 | 06.05.1985 | 27 August 1985 | 30 December 1985 | decommissioned and sold for scrap in 2007 | |
Russia | B-806 | x | Nizhniy Novgorod | 877EKM[citation needed] | 15 October 1984 | 30 April 1986 | 25 September 1986 | BF | active as of 2009, status in 2010 unknown |
India | S56 | Sindhudhvaj | Saint Petersburg | 877EKM | 01.04.1986 | 27 July 1986 | 25 November 1986 | active as of 2010 | |
Algeria | 012 | Rais Hadi Mubarek | Nizhniy Novgorod | 877EKM | 1985 | 1986 | 29 November 1986 | Upgraded in 2010, able to launch Klub missiles | |
Russia | B-439 | x | Komsomoľsk na Amure | 877 | 4 April 1986 | 31 July 1986 | 30 December 1986 | in reserve | |
India | S57 | Sindhuraj | Nizhniy Novgorod | 877EKM | 1986 | 1987 | 02.09.1987 | active as of 2010, modernized to project 08773 in 1999–2001 | |
Algeria | 013 | Rais Hadi Slimane | Nizhniy Novgorod | 877EKM | 1986 | 1987 | 25 November 1987 | Upgraded in 2011, able to launch Klub missiles | |
India | S58 | Sindhuvir | Saint Petersburg | 877EKM | 15 May 1987 | 13 September 1987 | 25 December 1987 | active as of 2010, modernized to project 08773 in 1997–1999 | |
Russia | B-445 | Svyatoi Nikolai Chudotvorets | Komsomoľsk na Amure | 877 | 21 March 1987 | 26 September 1987 | 30 January 1988 | PF | unknown (in reserve from 2007 or active) |
India | S59 | Sindhuratna | Nizhniy Novgorod | 877EKM | 1987 | 1988 | 14 August 1988 | active as of 2010, modernized to project 08773 in 2001–2003 | |
India | S60 | Sindhukesari | Saint Petersburg | 877EKM | 20 April 1988 | 16 August 1988 | 29 October 1988 | active as of 2010, modernized to project 08773 in 1999–2001 | |
Russia | B-808 | Yaroslavl | Nizhniy Novgorod | 877 | 29 September 1986 | 30 July 1988 | 27 December 1988 | NF | active as of 2010 |
Russia | B-394 | (ex Komsomolsk Tadjikistana) | Komsomoľsk na Amure | 877 | 15 April 1988 | 03.09.1988 | 30 December 1988 | PF | unknown (in reserve from 2007 or active) |
Russia | B-800 | Kaluga (ex Vologodskij komsomolets) | Nizhniy Novgorod | 877LPMB[citation needed] | 05.03.1987 | 07.05.1989 | 30 September 1989 | NF | refit as of 2012(refit finished launching of the vessel underway) |
India | S61 | Sindhukirti | Saint Petersburg | 877EKM | 05.04.1989 | 26 August 1989 | 30 October 1989 | in modernization to project 08773 from 2007 | |
Russia | B-464 | Ust'-Kamchatsk | Komsomoľsk na Amure | 877 | 26 May 1989 | 23 September 1989 | 30 January 1990 | PF | in reserve from 2007 |
Russia | B-459 | Vledikavkaz | Nizhniy Novgorod | 877 | 25 February 1988 | 29 April 1990 | 30 September 1990 | NF | unknown (in reserve from 2008 or active) |
India | S62 | Sindhuvijay | Saint Petersburg | 877EKM | 06.04.1990 | 27 July 1990 | 27 October 1990 | active as of 2010, modernized to project 08773 in 2005–2007 | |
Russia | B-871 | Alrosa | Nizhniy Novgorod | 877V[citation needed] | 17 May 1988 | 09.1989 | 30 December 1990 | BSF | active as of 2010 |
Russia | B-471 | Magnitogorsk | Nizhniy Novgorod | 877 | 26 October 1988 | 22 September 1990 | 30 December 1990 | NF | active as of 2010 |
Russia | B-494 | Ust'-Bolsheretsk | Komsomoľsk na Amure | 877 | 5 May 1990 | 04.10.1990 | 30 December 1990 | PF | unknown (in reserve from 2008 or active) |
Iran | 901 | Tareg | Saint Petersburg | 877EKM | 05.04.1991 | 25 September 1991 | 25 December 1991 | active as of 2012[20]Upgraded in Iran shipyard[21] | |
Russia | B-187 | x | Komsomoľsk na Amure | 877 | 07.05.1991 | 05.10.1991 | 30 December 1991 | PF | in reserve from 2007 |
Russia | B-177 | Lipetsk | Nizhniy Novgorod | 877 | 03.11.1989 | 27 July 1991 | 30 December 1991 | NF | active as of 2010 |
Russia | B-190 | Krasnokamensk | Komsomoľsk na Amure | 877 | 08.05.1992 | 25 September 1992 | 30 December 1992 | PF | active as of 2010 |
Iran | 902 | Noor | Saint Petersburg | 877EKM | 30 April 1992 | 16 October 1992 | 31 December 1992 | unknown (probably in modernization in Iranian shipyard) | |
Russia | B-345 | Mogocha | Komsomoľsk na Amure | 877 | 22 April 1993 | 06.10.1993 | 22 January 1994 | PF | active as of 2010 |
People's Republic of China | 364 | Yuan Zhend 64 Hao | Nizhniy Novgorod | 877EKM | ??? | 1994 | 10.11.1994 | active as of 2007 | |
People's Republic of China | 365 | Yuan Zhend 65 Hao | Nizhniy Novgorod | 877EKM | ??? | 1995 | 14 August 1995 | active as of 2007 | |
Iran | 903 | Yunes | Saint Petersburg | 877EKM | 05.02.1992 | 12.07.1994 | 02.09.1996 | active as 2011[22](probably in modernization in Iranian shipyard) | |
India | S63 | Sindhurakshak | Saint Petersburg | 877EKM | 16 February 1995 | 26 June 1997 | 02.10.1997 | On 29 January, 2013, the Sindhushastra began shipment to India from Severodvinsk, Russia after repairs. It will finally enter service upon arrival. [23] | |
India | S64 | Sindhushastra | Saint Petersburg | 877EKM | 12 December 1998 | 14 October 1999 | 16 May 2000 | active as of 2010 |
Project 636 units
Operator | # | Name | Shipyard | Project | Laid down | Launched | Commissioned | Fleet | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
People's Republic of China | 366 | Yuan Zheng 66 Hao | Saint Petersburg | 636 | 16 July 1996 | 26 April 1997 | 26 August 1997 | active as of 2006 | |
People's Republic of China | 367 | Yuan Zheng 67 Hao | Saint Petersburg | 636 | 28 August 1997 | 18 June 1998 | 25 October 1998 | active as of 2006 | |
People's Republic of China | 368 | Yuan Zheng 68 Hao | Saint Petersburg | 636M | 18 October 2002 | 27 May 2004 | 20 October 2004 | active as of 2006 | |
People's Republic of China | 369 | Yuan Zheng 69 Hao | Saint Petersburg | 636M | 18 October 2002 | 19 August 2004 | 2005 | active as of 2006 | |
People's Republic of China | 370 | Yuan Zheng 70 Hao | Saint Petersburg | 636M | 2004 | 05.2005 | 2005 | active as of 2006 | |
People's Republic of China | 371 | Yuan Zheng 71 Hao | Saint Petersburg | 636M | 2004 | 2005 | 2005 | active as of 2006 | |
People's Republic of China | 372 | Yuan Zheng 72 Hao | Saint Petersburg | 636M | 2005 | 2005 | 2006 | active as of 2006 | |
People's Republic of China | 373 | Yuan Zheng 73 Hao | Nizhniy Novgorod | 636M | 07.1992 | 08.05.2004 | 05.08.2005 | active as of 2007 | |
People's Republic of China | 374 | Yuan Zheng 74 Hao | Severodvinsk | 636M | 29 May 2003 | 21 May 2005 | 30 December 2005 | active as of 2006 | |
People's Republic of China | 375 | Yuan Zheng 75 Hao | Severodvinsk | 636M | 29 May 2003 | 14 July 2005 | 30 December 2005 | active as of 2006 | |
Algeria | 022 | ??? | Saint Petersburg | 636M | 2006 | 20 November 2008 | 28 August 2009 | active | |
Algeria | 023 (?) | ??? | Saint Petersburg | 636M | 2007 | 09.04.2009 | 29 October 2009 | active | |
Russia | B-261 | Novorossiysk | Saint Petersburg | 636.3 | 20 August 2010[24] | Summer 2013[25] | pl.2014 | BSF | laid down |
Russia | B-237 | Rostov-on-Don | Saint Petersburg | 636.3 | 21 November 2011[26] | pl.2014 | BSF | laid down | |
Russia | B-262 | Stary Oskol[27] | Saint Petersburg | 636.3 | 17 August 2012[28] | pl.2015 | BSF | ordered[17] | |
Russia | B-??? | ??? | Saint Petersburg | 636.3 | 2013 | pl.2015 | ordered[17] | ||
Russia | B-??? | ??? | Saint Petersburg | 636.3 | pl.2016 | ordered[17] | |||
Russia | B-??? | ??? | Saint Petersburg | 636.3 | pl.2016 | ordered[17] | |||
Vietnam | HQ-182 | Hà Nội | Saint Petersburg | 636M | 25 August 2010 | 28 August 2012[29] | pl.2013[30] | ordered | |
Vietnam | HQ-183 | Hồ Chí Minh City | Saint Petersburg | 636M | 28 September 2011 | 28 December 2012 | pl.2013 | ordered | |
Vietnam | HQ-184 | Hải Phòng | Saint Petersburg | 636M | August 2013[31] | pl.2014 | ordered | ||
Vietnam | HQ-185 | Đà Nẵng | Saint Petersburg | 636M | 2013 | pl.2015 | ordered | ||
Vietnam | HQ-186 | Khánh Hòa | Saint Petersburg | 636M | pl.2016 | ordered | |||
Vietnam | HQ-187 | Bà Rịa-Vũng Tàu | Saint Petersburg | 636M | pl.2016[30] | ordered |
Specifications
There are several variants of theKilo class. The information below is the smallest and largest number from the available information for all three variants of the ship.[32]
- Displacement:
- 2,300–2,350 tons surfaced
- 3,000–4,000 tons submerged
- Dimensions:
- Length: 70–74 meters
- Beam: 9.9 meters
- Draft: 6.2–6.5 meters
- Maximum speed
- 10–12 knots surfaced
- 17–25 knots submerged
- Propulsion: Diesel-electric 5,900 shp (4,400 kW)
- Maximum depth: 300 meters (240–250 meters operational)
- Endurance
- 400 nautical miles (700 km) at 3 knots (6 km/h) submerged
- 6,000 nautical miles (11,000 km) at 7 knots (13 km/h) snorkeling (7,500 miles for the Improved Kilo class)
- 45 days sea endurance
- Armament
- Air defence: 8 SA-N-8 Gremlin or SA-N-10 Gimlet[33] Surface-to-air missiles (export submarines may not be equipped with air defense weapons)
- Six 533 mm torpedo tubes with 18 53-65 ASuW or TEST 71/76 ASW torpedoes or VA-111 Shkval supercavitating"underwater missiles", or 24 DM-1 mines,
- Club S anti-ship missiles (only on some export versions)
- Crew: 52
- Price per unit is US$200–250 million (China paid approx. US$1.5-2 billion for 8 Project 636 Kilo class submarines)
No comments:
Post a Comment