Wednesday, February 12, 2014

A new ball game: US Challenges China’s Nine-Dash Line Claim, 12 February 2014, The Diplomat

It looks like a new ball game in the South China Sea. And per SWS survey, this is strongly supported by 82% of the Filipino people, and that includes your truly, having pursued this as a major personal and congressional advocacy since the mid-90s when China illegally, immorally, brutishly and perfidiously grabbed our Mischief Reef and violated our Exclusive Economic Zone, and continues to do so in the Scarborough Shoal or Bajo de Masinloc area:


US Challenges China’s Nine-Dash Line Claim

The Diplomat, 12 February 2014


“In recent weeks the Obama administration has done an about face on its position toward Asia’s sovereignty disputes, and is now actively challenging China on its nine-dash line claim to most of the South China Sea.”


xxx


"A series of comments by senior officials in the Obama administration in recent weeks mark a clear departure from that position. Instead of the previously neutral language the U.S. usually employs, Washington now is increasingly challenging the basis of China’s claims, particularly with regard to its nine-dashed line claim to nearly the entire South China Sea.


This was perhaps best exemplified by recent Congressional testimony from Danny Russel, the Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs.


“Any Chinese claim to maritime rights not based on claimed land features would be inconsistent withinternational law. China could highlight its respect for international law by clarifying or adjusting its claim to bring it into accordance with international law of the sea,” Russel told Congress last week.


“This includes continued restrictions on access to the Scarborough reef, pressure on the longstanding Philippine presence at the Second Thomas Shoal and the recent updating of fishing regulations coveringdisputed areas in the South China Sea. Our view is that these actions have raised tensions in the region and have exacerbated concerns about China’s long term strategic objectives.”


http://thediplomat.com/2014/02/us-challenges-chinas-nine-dash-line-claim/


US Challenges China’s Nine-Dash Line Claim
Image Credit: U.S. State Department

US Challenges China’s Nine-Dash Line Claim

22 Shares
3 comments
In recent weeks the Obama administration has done an about face on its position toward Asia’s sovereignty disputes, and is now actively challenging China on its nine-dash line claim to most of the South China Sea.
Until recently, the Obama administration had held steadfastly to the position that the U.S. does not take sides on any of the sovereignty disputes in Asia, but insists that parties to the dispute do not resort or threaten to resort to the use of force to settle them.
A series of comments by senior officials in the Obama administration in recent weeks mark a clear departure from that position. Instead of the previously neutral language the U.S. usually employs, Washington now is increasingly challenging the basis of China’s claims, particularly with regard to its nine-dashed line claim to nearly the entire South China Sea.
This was perhaps best exemplified by recent Congressional testimony from Danny Russel, the Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs.
“Any Chinese claim to maritime rights not based on claimed land features would be inconsistent withinternational law. China could highlight its respect for international law by clarifying or adjusting its claim to bring it into accordance with international law of the sea,” Russel told Congress last week.
He went on to take criticize specific Chinese actions.
“This includes continued restrictions on access to the Scarborough reef, pressure on the longstanding Philippine presence at the Second Thomas Shoal and the recent updating of fishing regulations coveringdisputed areas in the South China Sea. Our view is that these actions have raised tensions in the region and have exacerbated concerns about China’s long term strategic objectives.”
Similarly, while visiting the Philippines on Monday, Russel’s deputy, Scot Marciel, said: “What we’ve emphasized is the importance of all claimant states following international law, and kind of agreed-upon rules of behavior during the period when these disputes were under way…. So whenever you look at what we say publicly, it’s always about maintaining the peace, the stability that’s critical to prosperity in the region but also urging all the claimants, including China, to follow sort of rules and international law.”
The Obama administration has also acted preemptively in warning China against establishing a South China Sea Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ).
The strongest warning on this point was delivered by Evan Medeiros, senior director for Asian affairs at theNational Security Council. In an interview with Japan’s Kyodo News Agency late last month, Medeiros stated unequivocally: “We oppose China’s establishment of an ADIZ in other areas, including the South China Sea…. “We have been very clear with the Chinese that we would see that (setting up another ADIZ) as a provocative and destabilizing development that would result in changes in our presence and military posture in the region.”
Secretary of State John Kerry has issued similar warnings, albeit in a much more measured tone. This week, Gen. Hawk Carlisle, the commander of the U.S. Air Force’s Pacific Command, also spoke out against a potential South China Sea ADIZ during an interview with Defense News.
China has predictably taken issue with the Obama administration’s more critical position. In response to Russel’s comment last week, the Chinese Foreign Ministry put out a press release stating: “China’s rights and interests in the South China Sea are formed in history and protected by international law. China stays committed to resolving maritime disputes with countries directly concerned through negotiation and consultation.”
The statement went on to say: “Relevant comments made by the U.S. official in congressional testimony are not constructive. We urge the U.S. to be rational and fair and play a constructive role for peace, stability,prosperity and development of the region, rather than the opposite.”
This should give Kerry and Chinese officials much to talk about during the U.S. Secretary of State’s trip to Beijing this week.
COMMENTS
3
Inst
February 13, 2014 at 04:10
Ivan, hypersonic Chinese ICBMs with glide-boost vehicles to evade BMD.
Of course, the only winner in a US-China war is Russia, so for you it’s a perfectly good deal.
===
I support the United States pushing back against China in the South China Sea; since the nine-yard dash is patently ridiculous and most of the nations involved tend to be small countries with minimal military capabilities and no historical vendetta for China to pursue.
The East China Sea, on the other hand, is a whole other issue.
Ivan
February 13, 2014 at 00:48
The beginning.
Let there be no mistake.
China, and that does not mean just Beijing, but Chinese nationals with assets abroad, can pay dearly for conflict breaking out.
ImperiumVita
February 13, 2014 at 00:30
The entire world urges China to be rational and fair and the world gets spit in the face in return.

Share your thoughts

Your Name
required
Your Email
required, but not published
Your Comment
required
Trust Rating
88%
thediplomat.com
Close

No comments:

Post a Comment