Monday, February 24, 2014

The US Government speaks: 'No such thing as 9-dash line' – US envoy BY CARMELA FONBUENA, RAPPLER POSTED ON 02/24/2014

'No such thing as 9-dash line' – US envoy

 CARMELA FONBUENA
POSTED ON 02/24/2014 5:13 PM  | UPDATED 02/24/2014 11:08 PM
2
Comments
529
1
LinkedIn
0
Pinterest
547
Share
US ambassador to the Philippines Philip Goldberg. Photo by Carmela Fonbuena/RapplerUS ambassador to the Philippines Philip Goldberg. Photo by Carmela Fonbuena/Rappler
MANILA, Philippines – "There is no such thing as 9-dash line," United States ambassador to the Philippines Philip Goldberg told reporters on Monday, February 24, reiterating his country's rejection of China's basis for claiming portions of the South China Sea that are closer to the Philippines.
"We do not believe that the 9-dash line claim passes the legal test for determining or resolving disputesover South China Sea matters," Goldberg said during the annual prospects forum of the Foreign Correspondents Association of the Philippines in Makati City.
The ambassador was reiterating the statement of US Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Daniel Russel before the US Congress earlier in February.
Russel's statement is considered the first time that the US publicly rejected China's 9-dash line claim in the South China Sea. More US policymakers and military officers have since issued strong statements against China's aggressiveness. (WATCH: Expect stronger US message VS China's aggression)
The US supports the move of the Philippines to bring the maritime disputes to the United Nations body, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS).
The US maintains it is not taking sides on the maritime disputes but it has taken a position against any unilateral move to change the status quo. The US also opposes the establishment of the Air DefenseIdentification Zone (ADIZ) over the East China Sea and similar attempts to do the same over the West Philippines Sea.
Treaty allies, the US and the Philippines are finalizing a military-to-military agreement that will increase the presence of American troops in the Philippines. The Philippines sought the help of the US against the backdrop of escalating sea tensions.
"We want to conclude the agreement as soon as we can. There are still some details to work out. We have made progress in the agreement. We want to conclude it as quickly as possible but I won't set the date," said Goldberg.
Goldberg said the US military commits to continue helping the Philippines in terms of disaster relief,maritime security, peacekeeping, defense reform, and human rights.
"The Philippines has embarked on a program to build a minimum credible defense as is the right of sovereign nations. The US supports that effort. Nations need to be able to protect their borders and defend their people not just from traditional aggression but from transnational crime, smuggling, and international terrorism," Goldberg said.
The request of the Philippines coincides with the US strategy to rebalance to the Asia Pacific. Goldberg said the US wants to deepen alliance with the Philippines for the following interests: commercial,people to people, military and strategic ties.
"Note the order in which I put those priorities. If you think about the genesis of the rebalance, it starts on the recognition of the rise of Asia – the rise of China and Southeast Asia in terms of economic growth, population growth, and trade," he explained. – Rappler.com
Typhoon Yolanda (Haiyan)
Rappler's coverage of Typhoon Yolanda continues as we track the long road to recovery for typhoon-affected areas and keep tabs of the government's rehabilitation plans. Visitrappler.com/typhoon-yolanda for the latest updates.

Are you weather-proof?
Check out Rappler's #WeatherAlert for latest weather forecast wherever you are in the Philippines!
2 Comments
Pert Cabatana
9 hours ago
the US is giving us some mixed signals here. On one hand, by agreeing with our positioon that the 9-Dash line is not a valid basis for China's claim, and also agreeing that taking the UNCLOS route is the right way, they are actually siding with us. Yet they say they are not taking sides in the issue. And by saying that they are not taking sides, it also means they may not help defend our territory despite the mutual defense treaty. I wish they could be unequivocal on this matter. 
Bernard Opinaldo
2 hours ago
I guess, just like any other forms of paradoxical political speech, the US tries to tell everybody that they are not taking sides while increasing their military presence and fortifying their forward base stance here in the Philippines. Since the issue is highly sensitive (Much more sensitive than ever since Obama met with the Dalai Lama which was taken as an absurd step by China), the US doesn't want to startle China and passively start any unnecessary aggression in our transboundary waters.

You might like:

    No comments:

    Post a Comment