Monday, March 17, 2014

Pure madness By Conrado de Quiros Philippine Daily Inquirer 12:08 am | Tuesday, March 18th, 2014

There’s the Rub

Pure madness

By 
 0 16 11
Meet MLC-2006 Requirement
Download Free Guide. Improve CrewWelfare Using Broadband Technology
www.kvh.com/MLC2006Guide
The new arrangement is called “Agreement on Enhanced Defense Cooperation,” and Defense Undersecretary Pio Lorenzo Batino assures it is “80-percent done.” As though that news would elate us.
Not to worry, adds Ambassador Eduardo Malaya, the agreement does not allow the United States to put up bases in this country, it allows it only to use our bases.
And Filipino authorities will have complete access to the US installations set up inside those bases. That should dispel fears about infringement on sovereignty. “As a concept, access is assured, being within Philippine military bases. The right of the base commander to have access to specific areas shared with them has already been agreed (on) in principle by both panels.”
What can one say? What the —-?!
The least of what’s wrong with it is this: The problem with our agreements with the United States has never been the agreement, it has always been the implementation. Can anyone seriously imagine a scenario where the Filipino base commander tells his American counterpart wherever a dispute arises, “Open the gates, I need to see what’s on your grounds.” More than likely, the Filipino commander will not be authoritative, he will be deferential. He will not put his foot down, he will be accommodating. He will not be in charge, theAmerican official will. This is one case where the tail will wag the dog.
History shows so. It is American policy to neither confirm nor deny the presence of nuclear weapons in their installations. The American “base within a base” can have all the weapons of mass destruction it wants and we will be no nearer to glimpsing it than we would be Fort Knox. That is assuming in the first place that we want to know. Remember that this agreement is being hammered under conditions where the Philippine government desperately wants American armed presence in the region on the batty assumption that we need it for our protection and wouldn’t mind giving the United States as many bases as they want if only that were constitutionally possible. That is to say, under conditions where we are the beggars. Beggars can’t be choosers.
All this does is to give the United States the best of both worlds: having de facto military bases back without having to pay rent.
The most of what’s wrong with this is a couple of things:
One is that we already have the Mutual Defense Treaty (MDT), why in hell do we need to give the United States de facto bases here all over again? The MDT not quite incidentally should already show us how utterly inutile our military arrangements with the United States are. The MDT specifies very clearly that in the event of an attack on any portion of the US or Philippine territory, including those lying in the Pacific Ocean, the one is obliged to come to the defense of the other. The Pacific, all American officials have reaffirmed, extends in coverage to the South China Sea.
Arguably, the islands where China’s provocations are taking place are disputed territory. The United States itself, while condemning China’s belligerence, says it is not taking sides or a position on who owns the islands, notwithstanding that the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea is clear that countries have sovereign rights to waters up to 200 nautical miles off their shores.
But at the very least, surely the act of driving Filipinos away from the disputed islands by water cannons and various threats, not least Chinese gunships patrolling the area, constitutes an attack on territory the Philippines has a very strong claim to. Or that China has only a self-serving unilateral assertion of ownership to. Where is the American automatic military response to it as the MDT bids? Where is the American warship or two to confront the Chinese gunships there and protect the Filipino fishermen? What defense—at least of the Philippines, if not of America—does the MDT really give?
Two is that this spits on the blood, sweat and tears we expended just to rid ourselves of US military presence in this country. Can we have forgotten already how hard it took to kick out the US bases, Cory herself trying to people-power her way into keeping them? The Visiting Forces Agreement was bad enough and was already a stab in the back of it—Erap, who passed it as president, ironically having been one of the “Magnificent 12” that stopped the bases. He would joke later on, “Kala ko kasi visiting lang, malay ko bang permanent,” but some jokes hurt agonizingly when you laugh.
This one is worse. Much, much worse. And for what? Because of our problem with China in the Spratly Islands? That is believing that the best cure for a headache is to shoot yourself in the head.
As the VFA showed, the monumental atrocity here is that the agreement won’t just end with one government. The VFA did not end with Erap, the “Enhanced Defense Agreement” won’t end with P-Noy. It will commit the next governments to honoring that agreement till kingdom come. It will commit the nation to harboring US military enclaves in our bases till kingdom come. “Till kingdom come” is no exaggeration as we’ve seen from the fact that except for the brief period when the only general to become president of this country was in charge, who was Fidel Ramos, we’ve had US military presence in one form or another.
Long after P-Noy is gone, we will still be reeling under that presence. What a legacy to bequeath.
By all means let us protest China’s claim to the whole of the South China Sea and bring the world to vituperate against it. By all means let us bring America itself, with whom we share a fitful history, to lead the condemnation of it, however its own role in invading Iraq without UN sanction pulls the moral rug from under it. By all means let us call the Chinese leaders Hitler. But bring US servicemen and equipment to roost here all over again?
That’s just madness. Pure madness.

  • Question to CDQ "If the US bases that were kicked out of the country were here all along, you think China would have been these aggressive in taking our mineral resources?
      • Avatar
        ANA: "Ang tindi naman ng pagmamatwid ni CDQ (Agreement on Enhanced Defense Cooperation) sa pagitan ng Phl at USA, kase, para mawala raw ang sakit sa ulo, eh magbaril ka sa'yong sentido? Susmaryopes ka talaga, Seediykew, oke ka lang???"
        LISA: "Malaking duda kasi ni Conrado na NANGGOGOYO na naman ang mga 'Markano para magtayo muli sila ng base militar sa Pinas na ayon sa kanya eh (It will commit the nation to harboring US military enclaves in our base TILL KINGDOM COME). Ano ba'ng ibig sabihin no'n, alam mo?"
        CION: "Para sa'ken eh practical lang ang pagpayag ng gobyernong PNoy sa kasunduang binabanggit ni Ana. Kasi nga, wala talagang magagawa ang Armed Forces of the Philippines vs pambu-bully ng mga Tsekwa para tuluyang SAKUPIN nila tayo. Mapipigil lang ito siempre kung binabantayan tayo ng USA? Aminin!!!"
          • Avatar
            Let us not forget what this Chinese aggression that is highly tactical and well planned step by step taking of all of the South China sea and the West Philippine sea is all about. It is about the mineral resources, the oil and gas under that body of water 
            . By hook or by crook China will try and own all of it.
              • Avatar
                TSK TSK CDQ CDQ, so what is wrong when a little brown guy says open the gates, I want to get out of here, the gate being 'verbotten' to all? 
                Only Chinese ideologues will be reeling from the presence of US military here, ask the GROs and lawmakers. Money spent by US servicemen outside of the base is nothing to sneeze at and the cloak of security provided by US military presence is comforting to helpless little countries like ours. OR, it boils down to US or China in our shores, which do you prefer??
                  • Avatar
                    This is another one of those "emotional outburst" in line with those senators who "kick" the Americans out many years ago rendering the country vulnerable to foreign enemies. I do not have problem with the stance of CDQ if the security of this country have been nurtured and reinforced by those in power since the Americans left. The fact of the matter is our security has been weakened and compromised terribly by the festering twin rebellion from the communist and muslim with no solution in sight and the weak economic footing brought about by a corrupt and weak central government. China's aggressiveness are a result of these weakness and vacuum created by America's departure. This TOTAL lack of value the Philippines bring to bear in establishing a deterrence has made the Chinese behavior more aggressive and are now engaged in strengthening their position in those island chains. This position now seems to have taken a root as a "Line in the sand" of which our response has been so pathetic and weak. China is spending upwards of 300 Billion US dollars(Unpublished numbers) second only to the USA in defense spending, which is no match to our 6 Billion US Dollars mostly spend on personnel and containing internal rebellion. The reality of providing a credible military force with a strategic value and ensure security is to have hard assets in place and access by those who have resources to match your enemies in case of war or provide a geopolitical cover and military value to deter the potential enemy sufficient to change his behavior. The Political and Media leadership in the Philippines are as much guilty of failing to provide security and prevent the Chinese aggression since we "KICK" out the Americans. CDQs diatribe means nothing more than a case of weak position finding a stand that does not exist in reality of today's world of political maneuvering and HELPS the cause of the Chinese. Come to think of it Japan with GNP of 7 Trillion and Korea with GNP of 2 Trillion Dollars are hosting thousands of American Troops compared that with Philippine GNP of 250 Billion. The leadership of both countries are courageous and living in the "REAL WORLD" to realized the value of these strategic relationship and conduct their political and economic affairs without exhibiting any "tantrum" behavior which we Filipinos are good at and brings us only MISERY and confused conditions. The REALITY MR CDQ is the Philippines has NOTHING to BEAR on the table with the Chinese Aggressors and our Friends the Americans, otherwise OBAMA will be making Phone calls to our President or the Chinese will be sending a delegation on how we can mutually resolved the island issues beneficial to both countries. This dynamics is not going to change in the foreseeable future
                      • Avatar
                        It's neo-colonialism.
                          • Avatar
                            18mar14
                            nobody asked me, but.....well, CDQ, just look at the Ukraine problems.....if you CAN NOT articulate the reasons why Ukrainian would like to join EU and maybe NATO someday and NOT the mother russia, on which the citizens of Ukraine share many cultural heritage and language traits, only then i could see why "you" are so out of touch from the worlds' affairs.... ????
                            FYI, CDQ, the west philippines sea and the surrounding strategic choke points are right on the most important sea lane of communication that when "it" is control by any "self-serving-rogue-nation" could create socioeconomic and geopolitical problems to all nations along the pacific ocean rim and the nations along the indian ocean's trade routes. the phil. economy relied on the free access of these important sea lanes to export and import goods to and from our trading partners.
                            the phil navy and the rest of our military forces are light years behind in the "power curve" in comparison to our ASEAN neighbors' military might....to wit, the malaysian and the chinese military resources are much better in position than our military assets, but both country are still lacking the technology and know how to locate the missing MH370...the US military/civilian assets filled the "voids" and helping, as we speak, the malaysian authority to systematically and scientifically trying to "connect the dots" to help solve the problem of the missing aircraft.
                            the paranoia syndrome about the american re-establishing permanent base here in our country again is NOT helpful and NOT safe for our long range economic future and progress...the american forces presence here in our country is a part of strategic "deterrence", the first goal of US foreign and defense policy...to make sure that the "vital sea-lane of communication" along the west phillipines and the south china seas remain open and accessible to all to conduct commerce and trade, and unhindered from any unfriendly nation to use the power of "military coercion and 
                            political blackmail."
                            your "pure madness" connotation in re to US plan to access phil. bases would not hold water and doesn't adds up, CDQ....
                            I
                              • Avatar
                                Mr. Quiros, the price to pay for being the weak party among parties to the agreement...you take it or leave it? No..you Must take it...
                                  • Avatar
                                    Time and circumstances have changed, Conrado. Even Lorenzo Tanada can't prevent me from supporting this agreement. And I look up to that Man.
                                    Get your head out of the sand.

                                    Golf Swing Tips?
                                    Hit Golf Ball Straight Every Time.Free Golf Swing Video Lessons Here!
                                    squaretosquaremethod.com
                                    Follow Us

                                    11
                                     
                                    0
                                     
                                    4
                                    Google
                                    16
                                     
                                    Follow us on Facebook Follow on Twitter Follow on Twitter


                                    More from this Column:
                                    Recent Stories:
                                    Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.
                                    Short URL: http://opinion.inquirer.net/?p=72723
                                    Free Prophecy For You
                                    Get God's Plan For You in 2014. Receive Your Free Written Prophecy!
                                    Ads by Google


                                    Copyright © 2014, .
                                    To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.
                                    Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:
                                    c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94
                                    Advertisement
                                    MARKETPLACE
                                      Advertisement
                                      New York Times World
                                      nytimesworld
                                      China Releases Plan to Integrate Farmers in Cities nyti.ms/1edfzML
                                      43m
                                      World | TIME.com
                                      3 Big Questions Facing Putin and the West After Crimea Vote
                                      After Crimea votes to secede from Ukraine, Putin and the West face options ranging from a compromise solution to the specter of violence
                                      Al Jazeera English
                                      AJEnglish
                                      Even before the polls closed in Crimea, pro-Russian Crimeans, were celebrating on the streets of Simferopol. aje.me/Oo2yGB
                                      47m
                                      Al Jazeera English
                                      AJEnglish
                                      Epic discovery bolsters 'Big Bang' theoryaje.me/1ht1mKr
                                      8m
                                      New York Times World
                                      nytimesworld
                                      Questions Over Absence of Cellphone Calls From Missing Passengers nyti.ms/1ht0tBL
                                      13m
                                      World news and comment from the Guardian | guardian.co.uk
                                      US east hopes for last gasp of winter as freezing weather returns
                                      Virginia, New Jersey and Pennsylvania faced with at least a few inches of snow as patience wears thin after long winter
                                      New York Times World
                                      nytimesworld
                                      Why no phone calls or social media postings from Malaysia Airlines Flight 370? @KeithBradsher reports nyti.ms/1gGLWAE
                                      14m
                                      WSJ World News
                                      WSJworld
                                      Lack of Useful Radar Exposes Defense Weakness on.wsj.com/1cS85QU
                                      15m
                                      World news : Africa roundup | guardian.co.uk
                                      Nigerian gold mining: farmers choose death by lead poisoning over poverty | Monica Mark
                                      Unregulated mining in rural northern Nigeria is causing blindness and paralysis among children and making adults infertileFlanked by fields ...
                                      WSJ World News
                                      WSJworld
                                      London Banks Could Feel Squeeze From Russia Sanctions on.wsj.com/1cS83Zd
                                      15m
                                      Telegraph World News
                                      TelegraphWorld
                                      Crimea crisis: Russia pumps £250 million into Crimea tgr.ph/1edlxgz
                                      16m
                                      Newsy - World
                                      Crimean Parliament Applies To Join Russia
                                      Watch VideoAfter Sunday's overwhelming vote to unify Crimea with Russia, it didn't take long for the Crimean parliament to...
                                      Al Jazeera English
                                      AJEnglish
                                      Is the 'US framework' Obama's last chance at achieving an Israel-Palestine peace agreement? aje.me/Nn4Zbs
                                      18m
                                      Al Jazeera English
                                      AJEnglish
                                      Crimea held its hastily convened referendum on Sunday. Take a look at our gallery:aje.me/Oo3Kd2
                                      17m
                                      World news and comment from the Guardian | guardian.co.uk
                                      Nigerian gold mining: farmers choose death by lead poisoning over poverty | Monica Mark
                                      Unregulated mining in rural northern Nigeria is causing blindness and paralysis among children and making adults infertileFlanked by fields ...
                                      Foreign Policy
                                      ForeignPolicy
                                      How politicians and pundits misread “city on a hill” and butcher the real meaning of American exceptionalism. atfp.co/1iVTbf9
                                      41m


                                      Read more: http://opinion.inquirer.net/72723/pure-madness#ixzz2wG1DfOUp
                                      Follow us: @inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook

                                      No comments:

                                      Post a Comment