Thursday, April 3, 2014

SCARBOROUGH, AYUNGIN, MISCHIEF REEF. WHY FIGHT OVER SOME SMALL ROCKS IN THE MIDDLE OF THE OCEAN? Roilo Golez

"Scarborough is not small.  Including the huge lagoon inside, it has an area of 150 square kilometers, almost the size of Quezon City With little engineering works, its channel can be widened and deepened to make the lagoon accessible to navy ships. The lagoon’s depth is sufficient for China’s destroyers.  A country with advanced construction capability and financial muscle can transform this into a naval base. One can easily visualize how many ships can be anchored in a lagoon almost the size of Quezon City.

"Converted into a naval installation, Scarborough Shoal can be used to project power and monitor strategic and tactical communications of the Philippine government, the military bases, including the assets of our treaty ally, the US, once the rotational bases access agreement is made operational.

"Missiles can be installed in Scarborough Shoal that can reach in just a few minutes targets in Central Luzon, Metro Manila and Southern Tagalog."


SCARBOROUGH, AYUNGIN, MISCHIEF REEF. WHY FIGHT OVER SOME SMALL ROCKS IN THE MIDDLE OF THE OCEAN?
Roilo Golez, 3 April 2014

I am saddened, nay, shocked, when some ask the question, “Why fight over small rocks in the middle of the ocean?” when referring to the West Philippine Sea situation now approaching boiling point. To some, Mischief Reef, Scarborough Shoal, Pag-Asa, and now, Ayungin Shoal, are small rocks not worth fighting over.

I don’t know if such comments are driven by naiveté’ about geopolitics and warfare or just dictated by their plain desire to preserve the status quo because the status quo for them means:

1.    Peace at all cost in the face of a rising China or
2.    An ideologically based intestinal interlock with China or
3.    Fear, not wanting to antagonize the dragon for fear of being devoured.

In warfare and geopolitics, the potential force of a territory is not necessarily proportionate to the size of that territory. It is the location that determines how much potential and, in the end, kinetic force can be brought to bear from that territory.

In other words, how well one can project power, gain access to a bigger objective or, conversely, prevent access or deny access using that piece of territory, however small.

We should learn from history. Note how the Pacific War was won using tiny atolls, rocks, islets, with names like Truk, Tulagi, Saipan, Kwajalein Atoll, Tarawa Atoll, etc.,  dotting the vast Pacific Ocean as shown by this map:





That was the West Pacific area in 1941-1944.

Now we are looking at a smaller part of the West Pacific: The South China Sea.

The South China Sea today is considered by all strategic think tanks as the convergence point of the world’s three most powerful economic powers: The United States, China and Japan.  Add to that India, Australia, South Korea and Indonesia. Then the minor powers that are now joining the arms race: Vietnam and the Philippines. In the periphery, her intentions unclear, is Russia. It is without doubt the convergence point of the greatest powers, in absolute and relative terms, in the history of mankind.

Note the strategic location of the Philippines in the South China Sea theatre. The Philippines is athwart the eastern periphery of the South China Sea.  As such, every speck of Philippine territory is strategic in peace and in conflict.








China is fanning the flame of conflict with its nine-dash line, which only China respects and the rest dismisses as irrational and without legal and historical basis. And the Philippines has assumed center stage with China’s brazen grab, using raw, naked power, of Mischief Reef in 1995 and Scarborough Shoal in 2012. And now they are positioning to grab Ayungin Shoal as well. These territorial claims defy Common Sense, as shown by the following map, those “rocks” being way within the Philippine EEZ and so distant from the Chinese mainland.





Those who dismiss Scarborough Shoal as just small rocks in the middle of the ocean do not or refuse to appreciate the Shoal’s strategic importance. It is only around 120 nautical miles from the shores of Zambales and so close to the country’s vital economic and military installations: Subic, Clark, Metro Manila, primary airports and sea ports, power plants, Calabarzon and our Army, Navy and Air Force bases.



Scarborough is not small.  Including the huge lagoon inside, it has an area of 150 square kilometers, almost the size of Quezon City With little engineering works, its channel can be widened and deepened to make the lagoon accessible to navy ships. The lagoon’s depth is sufficient for China’s destroyers.  A country with advanced construction capability and financial muscle can transform this into a naval base. One can easily visualize how many ships can be anchored in a lagoon almost the size of Quezon City.

Converted into a naval installation, Scarborough Shoal can be used to project power and monitor strategic and tactical communications of the Philippine government, the military bases, including the assets of our treaty ally, the US, once the rotational bases access agreement is made operational.

Missiles can be installed in Scarborough Shoal that can reach in just a few minutes targets in Central Luzon, Metro Manila and Southern Tagalog.

Under the control of China and once miltarized, Scarborough Shoal could be transformed into an unsinkable aircraft carrier permanently parked in our front yard, well within our EEZ.

If anyone doubts the convertibilty of Scarborough Shoal for military purposes, consider this: More than 60 years ago, the US Navy converted a similar atoll around 1,200 miles from the Philippines into a staging area for the invasion of the Philippines. This was the Uilthi Atoll, with features similar to Scarborough, only around four times bigger.

Here’s Ulithi Atoll:





Just some small rocks in the middle of the ocean, but transformed to house part of Admiral Halsey’s huge Third Fleet that was the vanguard in the invasion of Japan-occupied Philippines in 1944.

This was how Ulithi looked on the eve of the Battle of Leyte Gulf:




Note the carriers and battleships and crusiers and destroyers anchored among those “small rocks.”

In a small way, the same is true in considering the strategic potential of Ayungin and Mischief Reef and what I predict is a power play to have more Chinese military installations in the area to project power and as a counterfoil against future enhanced bases in the Palawan area for use by the AFP and our treaty ally, and as China's staging area to grab the oil-rich Recto Bank with its reputed 5 billion barrels of oil and 55 tcf of natural gas.




Why fight over small rocks?  Now we know.


-----------------------------------------






2 comments:

  1. Very informative article, thank you Hon. Rolio Golez. All the while I thought Scarborough Shaol was a piece of rock that jots out of sea two meters high high tide. A lagoon? If developed by China into a military base, such a short distance to the Philippines is a big advantage than deploying its' military force from mainland China. China should be denied access to those reefs outside it's EEZ as a buffer zone.

    ReplyDelete
  2. China is heading in the direction that will force them to suffer the same fate many world powers do. The only big difference is, we never seen a country with a population size such as China, fold under its lust for power. Taking too much money out of circulation in order to create things that most all civilians in the world hate, war machines, has a disgusting effect on ones economy. There are so many things we neglect in the world in order to restore defenses, and warcrafts. We would be FAR better off, taking all the money we spend on militaries, which really add no value to the production of this world, and only the production of a single country, and use it to pay people to pick up garbage, and operate a shovel or hoe, making useful landscape projects out of cheap supplies. Yes, we would definitely get a lot more done. Then again, if we used all the money the world does to secure their countries, just to secure this world from natural disaster, then really, we would truly be able to thwart a meteor strike capable of destroying the planet by now. They say military machines is what advanced technology into this age throughout history, but still, it would be a lie to say that it is required to continue to advance. NASA isn't military minded, and if they had all the funds spent on war, we truly would be getting our fuel sources and finer metals from OTHER planets by now. China will learn the hard way just as we all did. When the income dries up, because they defeated their own consumers, they will be in a much worse place than any other country who ever came to this reality. Increasing wages, and giving more and more people more.... They have a lot more people to disappoint than most other countries do.

    ReplyDelete