US: Yes, China, we did send a small armada to the South China Sea

Golez: This is the huge advantage of the US Navy with its highly mobile carrier battle groups which can

be shifted quickly from one area to another. The fixed, indefensible islands, even the Woody Island fighter jets and HQ-9 missile array, are no match and can be easily destroyed in an actual conflict.

Golez:
The presence of a US carrier battle group in the South China constitutes the most assertive move of the US since tensions heightened in May last year. Beijing has no way of countering this. The missile array in China controlled Paracels can be easily neutralized. Ditto for the fighter jets in Woody Island. Meantime, construction work in the artificial islands presumably continues. Experts say that even if those islands are militarized, they would offer no advantage in tackling a carrier battle group. In fact, the US Navy considers the artificial islands as fixed, indefensible targets in an actual conflict.

US: Yes, China, we did send a small armada to the South China Sea

• Alex Lockie
 
•  

• 2h
• 3,800
 
• 2

• FACEBOOK
• LINKEDIN
• TWITTER

Kenneth Abbate via U.S. NavyThe USS John C. Stennis.

The US Navy has deployed a small armada to the disputed islands in the South China Sea, according to The Navy Times.

America's USS John C. Stennis aircraft carrier, destroyers Chung-Hoon and Stockdale, cruisers Antietam and Mobile Bay, and Japan's Blue Ridge were deployed after China installed HQ-9 surface-to-air missiles on Woody Island, one of the most central swathes of land in the disputed waters.

"China is clearly militarizing the South China Sea, and you'd have to believe in the flat Earth to think otherwise," Cmdr. Harry Harris, of the US Pacific Command, recently warned Congress.

"Our ships and aircraft operate routinely throughout the Western Pacific — including the South China Sea — and have for decades," Navy Cmdr. Clay Doss said in a statement.  "In 2015 alone, Pacific Fleet ships sailed about 700 combined days in the South China Sea."

But a carrier strike group's presence in the disputed waters speaks for itself.

"Clearly the Navy and DoD is demonstrating its full commitment to presence and freedom of navigation in the region,” said Jerry Hendrix, a retired Navy captain and analyst with the Center for a New American Security in Washington, DC, told The Navy Times. "With the full carrier strike group and the command ship, the Navy is showing the scope of its interests and ability to project presence and power around the world."

REUTERS/Ritchie B. TongoA Filipino soldier patrols an island shore in the South China Sea.

Additionally, US Secretary of Defense Ash Carter said on Tuesday that the US is willing to spend $425 million on joint military exercises with nations in the Pacific that feel threatened by China's militarization of the major trade route.

Of course, China denied militarizing the region and went as far as to blame the US instead, warning that the US was committing a "miscalculation of the situation."

"If you take a look at the matter closely, it's the US sending the most advanced aircraft and military vessels to the South China Sea," Fu Ying, the spokeswoman for the Chinese legislature, said. 

She continued:

The US has made it clear that it will deploy 70 per cent of its navy to the Asia-Pacific region under its strategy of pivoting to Asia. The US has stepped up military moves with its alliances and its military presence in the Asia-Pacific region. Isn't this militarization?

China has created islands with military-grade runways and missile-defense hardware on islands claimed by Japan, Vietnam, the Philippines, Taiwan, Malaysia, and Brunei.